Secret Entertainment Today: Rosaviation criticized the Dutch report downed over Ukraine “Boeing”

Rosaviation returned today to discuss the tragedy with the Malaysian “Boeing”, shot down in July the year before last in the sky over Ukraine. The Security Council of the Netherlands, which works under the auspices of the Commission of Inquiry sent a letter criticizing the report published in October. Since then, Russian experts analyzed the conclusions of Dutch colleagues, and, as I said, have found contradictions and inaccuracies.

The results of the investigation have studied Dutch side three months. During the analysis, as stated in the letter, the facts that prove: details of the final report are unfounded and unreliable.

“The final report, which was presented, showed once again that the task of the commission was all fit under already voiced and presented version, not objectively investigate the cause of the crash of the aircraft, “- said the authorized representative of the Russian Federation in the investigation of the disaster voyage MN17 Oleg Storchevoy.

One of the main conclusions of the Dutch due to the fact of a gun and some It was hit by a missile, “Boeing”. Dutch Safety Board concludes that the MH17 was knocked warhead 9H314M rocket series 9M38 supplied with weapons SAM “Buk”.

The Russian experts have established: the characteristics of the fragments and the holes on the fragments of the aircraft did not meet the characteristics of that formed by the explosion of the warhead 9N314M. It is packed with striking elements in the form of I-beams, or as they are called, butterflies. Shards must be thousands. The Dutch found only a few.

“It is very strange that for this investigation the quantity of these elements changed, it said three, then two. Where they were found, we are also, so to speak, did not see the documents. One, as we mentioned, it is found in the cockpit and removed from the cockpit. When we asked to provide us with material removal of how it should be done is recorded, photographed, they have it made with many other damaging elements that they found in the aircraft . With respect to I-beams do this is not done, “- said Oleg Storchevoy.

Butterflies leave characteristic holes in the skin of the aircraft. In October, producer of “letter”, “Almaz-Antey” took an unprecedented step and conducted field tests would look like if in “Boeing” hit by a rocket with a warhead, packed with I-beam. In the cockpit of the Malaysian “Boeing” is really a lot of traces of debris, but none in the form of a butterfly. In the cabin of the aircraft, which was shot during the experiment – a lot of holes characteristic of I-beams. Proof of the unreliability of the information in the report, Russian experts called and strange weight changes, allegedly found in the wreckage of the fragment.

“Despite the fact that in the presence of the whole Commission was photographed, and the striking element was weighed, and weighed 5.6 grams, in the final report for some reason he has presented weighing 6.1 grams. For us, it was also amazing, it’s in general a direct falsification of facts, “- said Oleg Storchevoy.

Even more significant are the results of a proof of falsification field tests” Almaz-Antey “, and experiment on modeling. The initial weight of the I-beam – 8 grams. During the research, Russian experts have established: the defeat of the plane element loses 10 percent. That is the maximum weight of an I-beam to be found about 7 grams. And according to experts, so the Dutch and the increased weight of the fragments allegedly found.

“You can not probably completely exclude the possibility that some of the rockets or fragments had been planted on the ground or planted later in the evidence base in the investigation. Who knows? After the investigation began not at once, several months militia invited investigators, but the group was in no hurry. Maybe it was done on purpose in order to then be able to accuse the militia? ” – The general director of the International Advisory and analytical agency “Safety” Sergei Melnichenko.

The proof of the use of missiles 9M38 series called the Dutch found fragments of the rocket. In August 2015 the Russian side shows photographs of the five fragments. Among them is the body portion of the third section of the rocket. It has no significant damage. However, field tests of “Almaz-Antey” proves that the explosion of the third compartment of the rocket to be seriously damaged.

Safety and the absence of traces of explosive strain on the body of the third compartment, allegedly found near the wreckage, “Boeing 777″, points out that he, most likely, does not belong to the rocket, the impact of which led to the crash

Perhaps this is why in the final report of the Dutch fragment of the third compartment is not mentioned. Russian experts analyzed the flight path and on which, according to the Netherlands, the missile flew, and the angle and distance from the explosion of its aircraft. The information provided in the Dutch report, contrary to the test data and the main characteristics of the rocket, and therefore the type of missile is incorrect, experts say.

“In the last act, as it is today, Oleg Storchevoy announced even contains a range of explosion. They pointed to a range, and then reduce it, and now do not have specified. This suggests that the Commission enjoys some serf and street data “, – said the Chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority of the Public Council Rostransnadzora, Honored Pilot of the USSR Oleg Smirnov.

Russia repeatedly offered the results of their research to the Dutch. But the conclusions of our experts were not taken into account. Although based on the separation of fragments, Russian specialists ahead exactly where the shot was fired – by Zaroschenskoe village, which was under the control of the Ukrainian military. However, a report in the Dutch place missile launch stated in a district area of 320 square kilometers. In the report there is one more very important discrepancy: the Netherlands argue that the “Boeing” knocked warhead 9N314M. This new type of warhead modified missile complex “Buk M1″, which is in service with Russia. The report concludes that the warhead was installed on the rocket series 9M38. This old series was only in service with Ukraine.

“It is not possible a new warhead mounted on the old type of missiles, it can not be technically and organizationally. Therefore, all these inconsistencies, we are talking about, they are just attracted the attention of Russian aviation, in fact, the letter sent to the Netherlands says about these inconsistencies, and we are once again consistently reminded in a very open, transparent mode, that the investigation is going wrong, “- said the chief editor of” National Defense “Igor Korotchenko.

” We objectively proved that the original version of a new modification of the missile “Buk-M1″, it can not fly the plane at an angle, with the specifics of the, shall we say, a trigger mechanism, then the Dutch side has already begun to deal with the fact that the missile was the combination, because they it was necessary to adjust all under those allegedly found items, “- explains Oleg Storchevoy.

In a letter to Oleg Storchevoy points to the fact that the Commission of Inquiry unfairly assessed the degree of fault of Ukraine. After all, according to the norms, Kiev had to completely close the airspace immediately after the outbreak of armed conflict. However, this was not done. This is a gross violation of international norms.

“In the world there is an international organization of civil aviation, it is called the ICAO. The laws, which it develops and which are obliged to implement all aviation companies and governments of those countries which are members of the ICAO states in black and white that the government of the country in which the fighting is obliged to close the airspace, in addition, put things in order, quite simply, in the ground infrastructure. Just the Ukrainian side has ignored completely the requirements “, – said chairman of the Public Council under the Federal Air Transport Agency, Peter Deinekin .

Another important thesis of the letter the chairman of the Security Council of the Netherlands is the conclusion of the Russian side of the unfounded statements about the likely presence in the east Ukrainian heavy air defense systems are not under the control of Kiev.

Photo